Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 21.381
Filter
1.
PLoS One ; 19(4): e0283915, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38635782

ABSTRACT

Anaphylaxis is a severe life-threatening hypersensitivity reaction induced by mast cell degranulation. Among the various mediators of mast cells, little is known about the role of tryptase. Therefore, we aimed to elucidate the role of protease-activating receptor-2 (PAR-2), a receptor activated by tryptase, in murine anaphylactic models using PAR-2-deficient mice and newly generated tryptase-deficient mice. Anaphylaxis was induced by IgE-dependent and IgE-independent mast cell degranulation in mice. PAR-2 deficiency exacerbated the decrease in body temperature and hypotension during anaphylaxis; however, the number of skin mast cells, degree of mast cell degranulation, and systemic and local vascular hyperpermeability were comparable in PAR-2 knockout and wild-type mice. Nitric oxide, which is produced by endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), is an indispensable vasodilator in anaphylaxis. In the lungs of anaphylactic mice, PAR-2 deficiency promoted eNOS expression and phosphorylation, suggesting a protective effect of PAR-2 against anaphylaxis by downregulating eNOS activation and expression. Based on the hypothesis that the ligand for PAR-2 in anaphylaxis is mast cell tryptase, tryptase-deficient mice were generated using CRISPR-Cas9. In wild-type mice, the PAR-2 antagonist exacerbated the body temperature drop due to anaphylaxis; however, the effect of the PAR-2 antagonist was abolished in tryptase-deficient mice. These results suggest that tryptase is a possible ligand of PAR-2 in anaphylaxis and that the tryptase/PAR-2 pathway attenuates the anaphylactic response in mice.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Animals , Mice , Anaphylaxis/metabolism , Immunoglobulin E/metabolism , Ligands , Mast Cells/metabolism , Receptor, PAR-2/genetics , Receptor, PAR-2/metabolism , Tryptases/genetics , Tryptases/metabolism
3.
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi ; 63(4): 406-411, 2024 Apr 01.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38561287

ABSTRACT

This study investigated the characteristics and frequency of perioperative anaphylactic shock induced by cefuroxime, so as to provide a reference for the safe and rational use of cefuroxime in the perioperative period. Cases of perioperative anaphylactic shock caused by cefuroxime in our hospital from 2011 to 2021 were extracted from the Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring System. Literature reporting adverse drug reactions (ADR) including cefuroxime-induced anaphylactic shock in perioperative settings was collected from the CNKI, VIP, Wanfang, PubMed, and Web of Science databases from their respective inception to May 2022. Statistical analysis was performed for all cases of cefuroxime-induced perioperative anaphylactic shock. A total of 31 patients were included [13 men (48.1%) and 14 women (51.9%)], most of whom were over 60 years old (n=16, 59.3%); 9 (29.0%) patients had a history of drug allergy; 5 (16.1%) patients had received skin tests, but with negative results; 28 (90.3%) patients received treatment intravenously; 22 (71.0%) patients were treated after anesthesia. For 20 (64.5%) patients the ADR occurred within 10 minutes after anesthesia. The main manifestations were hypotension, dyspnea, rash, and tachycardia. For all patients, symptoms resolved after withdrawal of the drug and active rescue, and there were no deaths. A history of allergy and skin test findings may have limitations in predicting perioperative anaphylactic shock caused by cefuroxime; greater vigilance should be exercised when using cefuroxime in the perioperative period. Close monitoring is recommended for patients undergoing treatment with cefuroxime. Rescue therapy should be administered for allergic shock, and suitable response measures must be taken in a timely manner to ensure the safety of patients.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Drug Hypersensitivity , Male , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Cefuroxime/adverse effects , Anaphylaxis/chemically induced , Anaphylaxis/complications , Retrospective Studies , Drug Hypersensitivity/etiology , Skin Tests/adverse effects
5.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 12(2): 451-457.e2, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38572700

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: About 10% of patients have a penicillin allergy label, but less than 5% of them are actually allergic. Unnecessary penicillin avoidance is associated with serious medical consequences. Given the growing number of these labels, it is imperative that our diagnostic strategy for penicillin allergy be as efficient as possible. The validity of traditionally used skin tests (STs) has been questioned, whereas drug provocation testing (DPT), the criterion standard, without previous ST appears very safe in most cases. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety of direct DPT without consideration for ST results and the validity of ST in the diagnosis of penicillin allergy. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study without a control group, we recruited patients consulting an allergist for penicillin allergy. Patients underwent ST followed by DPT regardless of ST results. Patients with anaphylaxis to penicillin within the past 5 years or a severe delayed reaction were excluded, as were those with significant cardiorespiratory comorbidity. RESULTS: None of the 1002 recruited patients had a serious reaction to DPT. Ten (1.0%) had a mild immediate reaction, of whom only 1 (0.1%) was considered likely IgE-mediated. The positive and negative predictive values of ST for an immediate reaction were 3.6% and 99.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In a low-risk adult population reporting penicillin allergy, ST has very poor positive predictive value. Direct DPT without ST is safe and appears to be an ideal diagnostic strategy to remove penicillin allergy labels that could be implemented in first-line practice.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Drug Hypersensitivity , Adult , Humans , Prospective Studies , Penicillins/adverse effects , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Drug Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Drug Hypersensitivity/complications , Predictive Value of Tests , Anaphylaxis/chemically induced , Skin Tests/methods , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects
6.
BMC Emerg Med ; 24(1): 67, 2024 Apr 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38627619

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Anaphylaxis is a potentially life-threatening allergic reaction, with presentations to emergency departments (EDs) increasing across Australia. Understanding the features of those presenting with anaphylaxis and aspects related to its optimal clinical management across the admission, treatment and discharge settings is needed to minimise its impact. We aimed to evaluate the nature and management of presentations related to anaphylaxis across two Australian EDs. METHODS: Retrospective audit of paediatric and adult patients presenting to a community or tertiary level ED with anaphylaxis from 1 May 2018 to 30 April 2019. Data extracted from medical records included demographic characteristics, causative agents, clinical features, treatments administered across community, ambulance or ED settings, as well as post-discharge care arrangements including provision of Adrenaline Auto-Injector (AAI) and Allergy/Anaphylaxis Action Plan (AAP). RESULTS: A total of 369 (107 paediatric and 262 adult) ED presentations were identified. A total of 94 (36%) adult and 46 (43%) paediatric patients received pre-hospital adrenaline, with a further 91 (35%) adult and 29 (27%) paediatric patients receiving a dose of adrenaline in the ED. The most commonly administered treatment in ED were corticosteroids, given to 157 (60%) adult and 55 (51%) paediatric patients. Among those requiring an AAI for discharge, 123/210 (59%) adult and 57/91 (63%) of paediatric patients left hospital with an AAI. In contrast, among those requiring an allergy/anaphylaxis action plan (AAP) on discharge, 61/206 (30%) adult and 30/90 (33%) of paediatric patients left hospital with one. Factors associated with an increased likelihood of receiving AAI on discharge in paediatric and adult patients included receipt of any adrenaline, receipt of two or more doses of adrenaline, and longer duration of hospital stay. Adults presenting within business hours were more likely to be discharged with AAI, but no such difference was observed for paediatric patients. Similar findings were evident for provision of AAP on discharge. CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate the need to improve assessment and treatment in the ED. In particular, the observed large variability in provision of AAI and AAP on discharge presents opportunities to explore strategies to improve awareness and provision of these critical components of post-discharge care.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Adult , Humans , Child , Anaphylaxis/drug therapy , Anaphylaxis/etiology , Aftercare , Retrospective Studies , Australia , Patient Discharge , Emergency Service, Hospital , Epinephrine/therapeutic use
7.
Immun Inflamm Dis ; 12(4): e1245, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38629759

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Drug hypersensitivity is a major global public health issue with a significant increase in prevalence in populations. Here, we provide a deep insight into the frontier hotspot and future direction in the field of drug hypersensitivity. METHODS: A knowledge map is portrayed based on publications related to drug hypersensitivity from Web of Science Core Collection using CiteSpace. Co-occurrence relationships of countries, institutes, authors, journals, references, and keywords are constructed. According to the co-occurrence relationships, hotspots and future trends are overviewed. RESULTS: The United States ranked first in the world and China with the second highest publications was the only developing country. Torres, Mayorga, and Blanca were highly productive authors. Harvard University was the institution with the most research publications. Keywords co-occurrence analysis suggested applications in emerging causes, potential mechanisms, and clinical diagnosis as the research hotspots and development frontiers. CONCLUSION: Research on drug hypersensitivity is in a rapid development stage and an emerging trend in reports of anaphylaxis to polyethylene glycols is identified. Developing algorithms for understanding the standardization process of culprit drugs, clinical manifestations, and diagnostic methods will be the focus of future direction. In addition, a better understanding of the mechanisms to culprit drugs with immunological precise phenotypic definitions and high-throughput platforms is needed.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Drug Hypersensitivity , Humans , Drug Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Polyethylene Glycols , Bibliometrics , Algorithms
8.
Curr Opin Pediatr ; 36(3): 251-255, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38655807

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Dexamethasone is an essential treatment for common pediatric inflammatory, airway, and respiratory conditions. We aim to provide up-to-date recommendations for treatment of anaphylaxis, croup, coronavirus disease, multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, and asthma with dexamethasone for use in the pediatric emergency department. RECENT FINDINGS: Literature largely continues to support the use of dexamethasone in most of the above conditions, however, recommendations for dosing and duration are evolving. SUMMARY: The findings discussed in this review will enable pediatric emergency medicine providers to use dexamethasone effectively as treatment of common pediatric conditions and minimize the occurrence of side-effects caused by gratuitous corticosteroid use.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Asthma , COVID-19/complications , Croup , Dexamethasone , Emergency Service, Hospital , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome , Humans , Dexamethasone/therapeutic use , Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Child , Croup/drug therapy , Asthma/drug therapy , Anaphylaxis/drug therapy , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/drug therapy , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage , Pediatric Emergency Medicine/methods
9.
PLoS One ; 19(4): e0299092, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38603709

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Medicine shortages prevail as a worldwide problem causing life-threatening situations for adults and children. Epinephrine auto-injectors are used for serious allergic reactions called anaphylaxis, and alternative auto-injectors are not always available in pharmacies. Healthcare professionals in Finland use the dedicated internet source, Physician's Database (PD), when seeking medical information in practice, while Health Library (HL) provides health information for citizens (S1 Data). The objectives were to assess whether (1) professionals' searches for epinephrine auto-injectors and (2) citizens' anaphylaxis article openings relate to epinephrine shortages in Finland. METHODS: Monthly log data on epinephrine auto-injectors (EpiPen®, Jext®, Emerade®) from PD and on openings of anaphylaxis articles from HL were collected during 2016-2022. Professionals' searches of seven auto-injectors and citizens' openings of four anaphylaxis articles were compared to information on epinephrine shortages reported by Finnish Medicines Agency. Professionals' auto-injector prescriptions provided by Social Insurance Institution were also assessed. RESULTS: Total searches in EpiPen® (N = 111,740), Jext® (N = 25,631), and Emerade® (N = 18,329) could be analyzed during 2016-2022. EpiPen® only could visually show seasonal patterns during summertime, peaking vigorously in the summer of 2018 when the major EpiPen® shortage appeared worldwide. Anaphylaxis articles equaled 2,030,855 openings altogether. Openings of one anaphylaxis article ("Bites and Stings") peaked during summertime, while another article ("Anaphylactic Reaction") peaked only once (three-fold increase) at the end of 2020 when COVID-19 vaccinations started, and auto-injector prescriptions were lowest. Fifty EpiPen®, one Jext®, and twelve Emerade® shortages were reported. Almost a two-fold increase in peaks of auto-injector prescriptions was found during summertime. CONCLUSION: This study shows that (1) epinephrine shortages related to professionals' searching for auto-injectors, and (2) citizens' information seeking on anaphylaxis related to summertime and shortages with lesser prescriptions. Therefore, the dedicated internet databases aimed at professionals and citizens could be used as additional information sources to detect anaphylactic reactions and auto-injector shortages.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Adult , Child , Humans , Anaphylaxis/drug therapy , Finland , Information Seeking Behavior , Epinephrine/therapeutic use , Data Analysis , Injections, Intramuscular
10.
Ital J Pediatr ; 50(1): 40, 2024 Mar 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38439086

ABSTRACT

Anaphylaxis is a life-threatening reaction characterized by the acute onset of symptoms involving different organ systems and requiring immediate medical intervention. The incidence of fatal food anaphylaxis is 0.03 to 0.3 million/people/year. Most fatal food-induced anaphylaxis occurs in the second and third decades of life. The identified risk factors include the delayed use of epinephrine, the presence of asthma, the use of recreational drugs (alcohol, nicotine, cannabis, etc.), and an upright position. In the United Kingdom (UK) and Canada, the reported leading causal foods are peanuts and tree nuts. In Italy, milk seems to be the most common cause of fatal anaphylaxis in children < 18 years. Fatal food anaphylaxis in Italian children and adolescents almost always occurs outside and is characterized by cardiorespiratory arrest; auto-injectable adrenaline intramuscular was available in few cases. Mortality from food anaphylaxis, especially in children, is a very rare event with stable incidence, but its risk deeply impacts the quality of life of patients with food allergy and their families. Prevention of fatal food anaphylaxis must involve patients and their families, as well as the general public, public authorities, and patients' associations.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Asthma , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Humans , Anaphylaxis/diagnosis , Anaphylaxis/epidemiology , Anaphylaxis/etiology , Quality of Life , Epinephrine/therapeutic use , Arachis
11.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 52(2): 45-47, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38459889

ABSTRACT

Cold urticaria is an inducible urticaria in which hives and angioedema appear after exposure to cold. The symptoms of cold urticaria often are limited to hives/angioedema. However, in up to 20% of cases, cold exposure may trigger anaphylaxis. We report the case of an 11-year-old boy previously diagnosed with chronic spontaneous urticaria who developed facial swelling, itchy hives, difficulty in breathing, vomiting and abdominal pain within 5 minutes of drinking cold water. He received a standard dose of non-sedating second-generation antihistamines at home. He was observed in the emergency room for 2 hours and discharged with an epinephrin autoinjector. During the subsequent outpatient clinic visit, an ice cube test was performed which confirmed the new diagnosis of comorbid cold-induced chronic urticaria. On further questioning, the parents reported occurrence of hives following swimming in the swimming pool. Cold-induced urticaria should be suspected in cases of anaphylaxis associated with cold exposure. Patients with chronic forms of urticaria who present with new anaphylaxis should be assessed for a potential concomitant cold-induced form.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Angioedema , Chronic Urticaria , Drinking Water , Urticaria , Male , Humans , Child , Anaphylaxis/diagnosis , Anaphylaxis/etiology , Urticaria/etiology , Urticaria/diagnosis , Cold Temperature
12.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 52(2): 48-50, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38459890

ABSTRACT

This report is a case of anaphylaxis in an adolescent due to allergy to gibberellin-regulated proteins mediated by cofactors, in probable relation to a pollen/food allergy syndrome. It should also emphasizes the importance of obtaining a faithful clinical history, especially when it comes to adolescent patients as they tend to initiate toxic habits.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Citrus sinensis , Food Hypersensitivity , Humans , Adolescent , Anaphylaxis/diagnosis , Anaphylaxis/etiology , Gibberellins/adverse effects , Allergens , Antigens, Plant , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis
13.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 52(2): 32-44, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38459888

ABSTRACT

The incidence of food allergies has risen around the globe, and experts have been exploring methods of preventing such allergies in young children to ease the burden of disease and reduce the morbidity and mortality caused by anaphylaxis to food allergens. Such preventative measures can be categorised as primary, secondary and tertiary prevention, which are discussed in detail in this review. Primary prevention is defined as the prevention of becoming sensitised towards specific allergens. The evidence suggests that avoiding common allergenic foods during pregnancy and breastfeeding is not protective against food allergies, and guidelines recommend weaning from 4 to 6 months of age, with recent studies supporting the early introduction of peanuts at 4 months to prevent peanut allergy. Secondary prevention targets patients who are already sensitised and aims to halt the progression of sensitisation, with evidence for high rates of success and safety in trials of early introduction to milk and peanuts using oral immunotherapy in sensitised infants. Tertiary allergy prevention focuses on reducing the risk of a patient having anaphylaxis, with oral immunotherapy being the most common method of promoting tolerance in allergic children. Several studies have demonstrated successful reintroduction for milk, egg and peanut; however, no such guidelines are recommended for other foods. Finally, dietary advancement therapy in the form of milk and egg ladders has been employed as a method of primary, secondary and tertiary prevention of allergies, particularly in Ireland, the UK and Canada.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Food Hypersensitivity , Infant , Child , Female , Pregnancy , Humans , Child, Preschool , Anaphylaxis/prevention & control , Tertiary Prevention , Food Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Breast Feeding , Diet/methods , Allergens , Arachis
15.
Allergy Asthma Proc ; 45(2): 120-127, 2024 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38449011

ABSTRACT

Background: Lipid transfer proteins (LTP) are the most common food allergens in the Mediterranean region. Objective: The study aimed to investigate co-sensitization patterns and cluster relationships between LTP allergen molecules across a broad range of allergen-specific sensitization patterns, and clinical outcomes in eastern Mediterranean children. Methods: Among 496 children evaluated for multiple sensitizations with multiplex testing, 105 children (21%) with 16 different LTP sensitizations were analyzed. Clinical reactivity was examined based on clear-cut history of immunoglobulin E mediated symptoms (oral allergy syndrome [OAS], systemic reactions, and anaphylaxis). Results: All children included were sensitive to food LTPs, but 56% were sensitive to pollen LTPs. The number of children with OAS and clinical reactivity was 12 and 59, respectively, and no cofactors were reported. The most common sensitizations were Pru p 3 (74%) and Cor a 8 (66%). Significant correlations were observed in the heatmap between the LTP molecules other than Par j 2 and Tri a 14. Overall, clinical reactivity was associated with increased age and number of LTP molecule positivity. Conclusion: In the eastern Mediterranean region, 21% of children with multiple food and/or pollen sensitizations were found to have LTP sensitization; however, almost half reported clinical reactivity. The hierarchical pathway highlights that distinct LTP allergen molecules can act as primary sensitizers. Clinical reactivity is linked to increasing numbers of LTP molecule positivity and increasing age.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Carrier Proteins , Clinical Relevance , Child , Humans , Food , Allergens
16.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol ; 35(3): e14096, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38425150

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Allergy to beta-lactam antibiotics (BLA) is frequently suspected in children, but a drug provocation test (DPT) rules it out in over 90% of cases. Direct oral DPT (DODPT), without skin or other previous tests, is increasingly been used to delabel non-immediate BLA reactions. This real-world study aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of DODPT in children with immediate and non-immediate reactions to BLAs. METHODS: Ambispective registry study in children (<15 years), attended between 2016 and 2023 for suspected BLA allergy in 15 hospitals in Spain that routinely perform DODPT. RESULTS: The study included 2133 patients with generally mild reactions (anaphylaxis 0.7%). Drug provocation test with the implicated BLA was performed in 2014 patients (94.4%): 1854 underwent DODPT (86.9%, including 172 patients with immediate reactions). One hundred forty-five (7.2%) had symptoms associated with DPT, although only four reactions were severe: two episodes of anaphylaxis and two of drug-induced enterocolitis syndrome, which resolved rapidly with treatment. Of the 141 patients with mild reactions in the first DPT, a second DPT was considered in 87 and performed in 57, with 52 tolerating it without symptoms. Finally, BLA allergy was ruled out in 90.9% of the sample, confirmed in 3.4%, and remained unverified, usually due to loss to follow-up, in 5.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Direct oral DPT is a safe, effective procedure even in immediate mild reactions to BLA. Many reactions observed in DPT are doubtful and require confirmation. Severe reactions are exceptional and amenable to treatment. Direct oral DPT can be considered for BLA allergy delabeling in pediatric primary care.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Drug Hypersensitivity , Child , Humans , beta-Lactams , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Skin Tests/methods , Anaphylaxis/chemically induced , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Drug Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Monobactams
17.
J Korean Med Sci ; 39(8): e76, 2024 Mar 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38442719

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: During coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, several COVID-19 vaccines were licensed with fast-track procedures. Although these vaccines have demonstrated high immunogenicity, there has been concerns on the serious adverse events (AEs) following COVID-19 vaccination among adolescents. We aimed to analyze comparative safety of COVID-19 vaccination in adolescents. METHODS: In this pharmacovigilance study, we performed a disproportionality analysis using VigiBase, the World Health Organization's global individual case safety report (ICSR) database. To compare serious AEs reported following COVID-19 vaccines vs. all other vaccines in adolescents aged 12-17 years, ICSRs following any vaccines on adolescents aged 12-17 years were included, defining cases as reports with the AEs of interest, with all other AEs as non-cases. The AEs of interest were myocarditis/pericarditis, multisystem inflammatory syndrome/Kawasaki disease (MIS/KD), anaphylaxis, Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), and immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). We conducted a disproportionality analysis to estimate reporting odds ratio (ROR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for each AE of interest, adjusted for sex by using logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 99,735 AE reports after vaccination in adolescents, 80,018 reports were from COVID-19 vaccinated adolescents (52.9% females; 56.3% America). The AEs of interest were predominantly reported as serious AE (76.1%) with mRNA vaccines (99.4%). Generally, higher reporting odds for the AEs were identified following COVID-19 vaccination in adolescents; myocarditis/pericarditis (2,829 reports for the COVID-19 vaccine vs. 35 for all other vaccines, adjusted ROR [aROR], 19.61; 95% CI, 14.05-27.39), and MIS/KD (104 vs. 6, aROR, 4.33; 95% CI, 1.89-9.88). The reporting odds for anaphylaxis (515 vs. 165, aROR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.72-1.02), GBS (94 vs. 40, aROR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.44-0.92) and ITP (52 vs. 12, aROR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.59-2.09) were not significantly higher following COVID-19 vaccination. CONCLUSION: In this study, there were disproportionate reporting of immune-related AEs following COVID-19 vaccination. While awaiting definitive evidence, there is a need to closely monitor for any signs of immune-related AEs following COVID-19 vaccination among adolescents.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Guillain-Barre Syndrome , Mucocutaneous Lymph Node Syndrome , Myocarditis , Pericarditis , Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic , Adolescent , Female , Humans , Male , Anaphylaxis/epidemiology , Anaphylaxis/etiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Guillain-Barre Syndrome/epidemiology , Guillain-Barre Syndrome/etiology , Pharmacovigilance , Vaccination/adverse effects
18.
Int Immunopharmacol ; 131: 111851, 2024 Apr 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38492337

ABSTRACT

Allergic diseases have become a serious problem worldwide and occur when the immune system overreacts to stimuli. Sargassum horneri is an edible marine brown alga with pharmacological relevance in treating various allergy-related conditions. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effect of fucosterol (FST) isolated from S. horneri on immunoglobulin E(IgE)/bovine serum albumin (BSA)-stimulated allergic reactions in mouse bone marrow-derived cultured mast cells (BMCMCs) and passive cutaneous anaphylaxis (PCA) in BALB/c mice. The in silico analysis results revealed the binding site modulatory potential of FST on the IgE and IgE-FcεRI complex. The findings of the study revealed that FST significantly suppressed the degranulation of IgE/BSA-stimulated BMCMCs by inhibiting the release of ß-hexosaminidase and histamine in a dose-dependent manner. In addition, FST effectively decreased the expression of FcεRI on the surface of BMCMCs and its IgE binding. FST dose-dependently downregulated the expression of allergy-related cytokines (interleukin (IL)-4, -5, -6, -13, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, and a chemokine (thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC)) by suppressing the activation of nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) and Syk-LAT-ERK-Gab2 signaling in IgE/BSA-stimulated BMCMCs. As per the histological analysis results of the in vivo studies with IgE-mediated PCA in BALB/c mice, FST treatment effectively attenuated the PCA reactions. These findings suggest that FST has an immunopharmacological potential as a naturally available bioactive compound for treating allergic reactions.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Anti-Allergic Agents , Hypersensitivity , Sargassum , Stigmasterol/analogs & derivatives , Mice , Animals , Immunoglobulin E/metabolism , Serum Albumin, Bovine , Sargassum/metabolism , Mast Cells , Passive Cutaneous Anaphylaxis , Hypersensitivity/drug therapy , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/metabolism , Cell Degranulation , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Anti-Allergic Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Allergic Agents/therapeutic use
19.
Magn Reson Imaging ; 109: 96-99, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38467266

ABSTRACT

Esophageal thermal injury is one of the most devastating complications of atrial radiofrequency ablation, and its diagnosis can be challenging. In this report, we highlight the novel use of free water as a contrast material to better visualize the esophageal lumen in a patient with anaphylaxis to Iodinated contrast media and Gadolinium who recently underwent atrial fibrillation ablation. This becomes particularly handy in patients with contrast allergy, and further emphasizes the role of multimodality imaging.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Atrial Fibrillation , Catheter Ablation , Esophageal Perforation , Humans , Atrial Fibrillation/surgery , Esophageal Perforation/diagnosis , Esophageal Perforation/etiology , Esophageal Perforation/surgery , Gadolinium/adverse effects , Anaphylaxis/chemically induced , Anaphylaxis/diagnosis , Contrast Media/adverse effects , Catheter Ablation/adverse effects , Catheter Ablation/methods
20.
Arch Pediatr ; 31(3): 209-211, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38538467

ABSTRACT

We report an unusual case of anaphylaxis induced by the lysozyme-containing over-the-counter-drug Lysopaine®, which contains 20 mg lysozyme hydrochloride and 1.5 mg cetylpyridinium chloride, in a 9-year-old child with allergy to hen's egg as well as multiple IgE-mediated food allergies. The involvement of lysozyme was confirmed by positive skin prick tests for Lysopaine® and the presence of specific IgE against lysozyme. Our case highlights the importance of properly educating allergic patients to recognize allergens, even minor ones. Despite the presence of lysozyme in various food and drug products, it is not necessarily perceived as an allergenic protein by patients with egg allergy, and the labeling may be misleading, thereby exposing patients to potentially severe reactions.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Egg Hypersensitivity , Child , Humans , Female , Animals , Egg Hypersensitivity/complications , Egg Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Anaphylaxis/diagnosis , Anaphylaxis/etiology , Muramidase/adverse effects , Chickens , Immunoglobulin E , Allergens/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...